胡適留學日記卷十一二六、韋兒斯行文有誤

卷十一二六、韋兒斯行文有誤

　　H. G. Wells seems to have the habit of omitting the nominative relative pronoun "that" or "which" after the impersonal "it". Examples: "It was her money equipped us."

　　—inThe New Machiavelli

　　〔中譯〕

　　H. G. 韋兒斯似乎有一個習慣，他總是省略非人稱代詞「it」後面之主格關係代詞「that」或「which」。例如：「It was her money equipped us.」

　　——見《新馬基雅維裡》

學達書庫(xuoda.com)